Tuesday, 9 October 2012

Return Journey of Hope or Hurt


Ill take you home again Kathleen
Across the ocean wild and wide
To where your heart has ever been.
(Irish emigrant song about returning home)

RETURNING HOME.

Cynthia emigrated from Jamaica to Britain in the 1950s. There she met her Jamaican husband Timothy. They both worked for British rail. Like many other immigrants they planned to return home and bring up a family in Jamaica. They had two children and decided for the childrens education and for financial reasons to remain in Britain until retirement. They returned annually on holidays to Jamaica and on one holiday bought a plot of land on which they would build a house which would be their new home on return. They enjoyed their holidays in Jamaica, free from racism and the starkness of London streets in winter time. They looked forward to return. Retirement day arrived, they packed up and returned to an almost complete house that they struggled to complete with an indecisive contractor. Like other houses, it was surrounded by a high wall they thought would give adequate security. They were mistaken. Regularly robbed, unwillingly they decided to steel grill all windows and doors for their own security. But they felt more like prisoners. Their relatives consistently begged off them and if they refused to give they were insulted. Gradually they got the message that they were unwelcome even if the Jamaican government of the day officially welcomed them back. They longed to be back in Tottenham. They felt trapped. Having sold their house in London and invested in a house in Jamaica they felt they made a huge mistake. However, they decided to tuff it out. Then Timothy, who more than Cynthia had a return bug, died suddenly of a heart attack. Cynthia was always betwixt and between about returning to Jamaica in the first instance. Her lived experience of their return to Jamaica helped make up her mind to return to London after Timothy passed away. She was not enamoured by their relatives and some neighbours who resented their presence. So, she made up her mind to leave whether or not she could sell the house. She sold the fittings and house furniture. Then she went to meet the local priest, a foreigner, and requested to stay in the rectory for a few days. Though she was of a different faith she felt that he would be sympathetic to her plans. He understood. She then employed a bulldozer operator, paid him, and had the house she and her husband constructed razed to rubble leaving nothing for anybody to pilfer. The next day she took an Air Jamaica flight back to London.        

I left home young and not till old I do come back,
My accent is unchanged, my hair no longer black,
The children dont know me, whom I meet on the way,
Where dyou come from, reverend sir? they smile and say.
(He Zhizhang)

There is a tendency for those who are emigrating to idealise their destinations. However, as the time of departure nears, leaving home, family, friends, city, town and village become part of the internal preparation. In making a decision to leave there are a myriad of relationships that are broken. As the day of departure draws near another tendency to idealise where one is leaving surfaces.  It happens at a point when one realises that they are not part of future plans or events. A throwaway remark by a friend may spark it off. A feeling of exclusion emerges as one is caught betwixt and between. But since departure is planned there is no turning back. One is left in a vacuum, neither at home nor away. 

At this point in ones confusion a tourist brochure memory of home emerges to compete with the ideal of the destination. The memory of home dominates. It is a kind of natures sanity shield in coping with the separation of departure and the future confusion and discomfort of the unknown. It is this memory that one carries for the rest of their lives even if it bears no relation to the humble, deprived situation left behind. A tourist brochure memory is not reality but it is a comfort blanket to return to in times of confusion and discomfort in the new. It also keeps alive a strong return migration tendency. Returning on holidays at holiday times of year in the home country feeds this memory and encourages return. During holidays the weather is good, there are people around and they know that one is here for the holidays. The first question probably that an immigrant is asked on return is; where are you now and when are you going back?

In the minds of the locals, family, friends and neighbours, a returning immigrant is placed somewhere other than where they are standing just now. An immigrant is supposed to be away, somewhere. The immigrant on holidays in their former home is emotionally porous and that condition remains after return from holiday, pulling at the heart strings with a return tune that seems easily accomplished. As they return from holiday they feel caught between two homes, past and present.  Thoughts of return migration seem a reality. Sadly, for some they pursue a dream that has not been properly thought out, objectively analysed based on economic, social and cultural facts. The tourist brochure picture distorts the facts, a hasty decision is made to uproot on the assumption that there are now opportunities where in the past there were none.         

Now that Ireland is experiencing emigration again comparable to the worst decades of the past there is a regular mantra from institutional leaders in public life that emigration is a temporary glitch that will reverse itself when the “economy picks up.” In a celebrity-driven world optimism is an opiate, a myth,  that is used to divert attention from a harsh reality that the future for many is not coming back nor is it going to be better than the past. Continuous economic growth is an enduring myth that a fragile public need to be nurtured with by institutional leaders even if the opposite is true.

The democratic, equality aspired socialist order that evolved after the second world war began to decline in the late 1970s. A realisation that not everyone would have in the future their own house, two-car garage, children at university or that the next generation would be better off than their parents began to emerge. Various emergencies, food, oil, riots, three-day weeks signalled to the populations that the socially underpinned deals of the previous three decades were off. According to the new dealers, society did not exist, implying that the structures that underpinned society did not exist either. Essentially, this meant that it was the individual that succeeded or failed by his/her own wit or weakness. The social partners in society were undermined. Everyone could have political rights but they do not provide jobs and incomes. Competitiveness became the key word. The link between productivity and reward was blurred, wages stood still or declined, wealth was transferred to the top of society ending up chasing speculation in markets detached from manufacturing, commerce and everyday life. Wage earners, like the mythical Syd, were encouraged to invest in the market particularly in those state agencies that were privatised. Risk replaced trust, designer charity replaced justice and jobs were outsourced to China.

The public was also told that if at thirty three they were using public transport to get to work they were failures. At the same time they were advised to aspire to own their homes. However, this time the home was equated to a casino chip that had access to endless refinancing in the mortgage casinos. The credit card became the pass to any possibility. Interest rates were liberalised by effective lobbying in parliaments making the institutions of the state, courts, lawyers, police, sheriff, banks and licensed debt collectors. Sadly, when the economy failed, people were left scampering for survival, emigration again became a reality, this time from opulence at home to hardship in a foreign city. Abandoned and massaged by their leaders they leave in the false assumption when “things get back to normal and growth takes hold” they will be back.          

However, both at home and away people need to be given the painful facts regarding the possibility of return migration. This would prepare them to make long-term decisions in regard to settlement, investment in property and integration. People left hanging between two cultures, like broken tree branches, perish. Few in public positions are telling the public how it came about that too many people are now chasing too few jobs. About thirty years ago Europe and the United States began to export manufacturing jobs that came cheaper elsewhere. Only a tenth of the investment flowing into stock markets ended up in industry. The rest chased speculative casino-type profit. According to the gurus of the day the future lay in financial services, a European carry-over from its past-get others to do the dirty work. Even now, unemployed Europeans are still being advised that their futures are elsewhere, new conquistadores, and when things improve they will be back having acquired work experience and new skills. 

A few things that need to be kept in mind about return migration.

*Get objective information about the economy that one plans to return to.
*Work opportunity, housing, health care, communications, children’s education, security.
*The returning immigrant has a lived experience of emigration.
*Those who haven’t experienced migration are acting out of the anecdotal accounts of others.
*There needs to be a shared experience of home and away.
*Those returning have had a three-phased life-before leaving, living abroad and now returning.
*The home economy may not need the skills acquired by the returnee.
*Those at home may view the returnee as a threat to their jobs.
*Realise that nothing is the same as before.
*Industrial skills are of little use in a service economy. 
*Return can be as traumatic as leaving.
*Be prepared for culture shock, the discomfort of change and the emotions of departure.
*In a family each member has a personal journey to travel.
*Each individual needs time to process their journey home.
*Odious comparisons hurt.
*Home and away cultures are not perfect.
*Be aware of being a “when I was.”

  The boy came home from a foreign land,
Weary and wan with his staff in his hand;
Five years’ absence had left their trace
On golden hair, on sunny face.
His gait was weary, his limbs were sore;
His youthful friends knew him no more.
(The Return. Patrick MacGill)

No comments:

Post a Comment